Reklami Sat, 18 Sep 2021 07:57:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Reklami 32 32 COLUMN MP: Tour of Great Britain, a “superb publicity” for the city Sat, 18 Sep 2021 07:57:00 +0000 IN this week’s column, Labor MP for Warrington North Charlotte Nichols highlights the upcoming Tour of Britain in Warrington.

The parliamentary recess is a great opportunity to fill my journal with as many constituency events as possible and this year has not disappointed. A huge plus is meeting so many wonderful local volunteers, like at Padgate Community Garden – where I got to see them in action – and Roy Humphreys Community Center, where I joined in their popular family fun day. I meet so many inspiring people like those who participate in the National Citizen Service with the Warrington Youth Club who have told me about their disability awareness project.

Recess is also a great way to learn more about the crucial work of our local charities, such as visiting the Warrington Visually Impaired People charity where I had great conversations with staff and volunteers to find out what how much their center is appreciated and how much it has been missed. Last year.

The Tour of Britain in Warrington was a great advertisement for our town. Well done to everyone who helped organize this world class event in Warrington. As a local MP, I was delighted to help and will do anything to ensure that we capitalize on its success, not only by regenerating the city center, but by promoting more active commutes and making cycling easier for people. of all ages.

After this busy holiday, Parliament returned last week, so I was back in London to speak for Warrington in Westminster.

On Tuesday, I was able to present my bill to introduce a charter for disabled passengers in public transport. Many of us without disabilities suffer and complain about the condition of our buses and trains and the lack of investment in transport in the north, but people with disabilities face much broader challenges.

For some people it is difficult to get in or out of vehicles, especially when pre-booked help is not displayed, some wheelchair users find their spaces blocked by groceries or strollers, and some visually impaired people may have trouble recognizing destinations. There are many barriers for people with disabilities who use public transport to gain the dignity and freedom to travel independently.

Surveys have shown that 80% of people with disabilities find that traveling on public transport causes them anxiety and stress, but one in six people don’t even know how to complain because the rules vary so much.

My bill would bring together all the rights of people with disabilities on the different modes of transport as well as the complaints procedures in one simple document to make their lives easier. This would ensure that transport operators are transparent in their rules and show where there are inconsistencies. It would be an inexpensive way to improve the lives of millions of people.

Now that my bill has been introduced, I will try to encourage the government to support it, and I would appreciate if readers could urge their MPs to support it as well.

]]> 0
Apple, Google and Facebook Fight for Digital Privacy to Reshape the Internet, World News & Top Stories Sat, 18 Sep 2021 07:10:24 +0000

SAN FRANCISCO (NYTIMES) – Apple introduced a pop-up for iPhones in April that asks people for their permission to be tracked by different apps.

Google recently announced its intention to disable tracking technology in its Chrome web browser.

And Facebook said last month that hundreds of its engineers were working on a new method of serving ads without relying on people’s personal data.

The developments may seem like technical tinkering, but they were tied to something bigger: an intensifying battle for the future of the internet.

The struggle has entangled tech titans, turned Madison Avenue upside down and disrupted small businesses.

And it heralds a profound change in the way people’s personal information can be used online, with sweeping implications for how businesses make money digitally.

At the center of the brawl is what has been the lifeblood of the Internet: advertising.

Over 20 years ago, the Internet revolutionized the advertising industry.

He gutted newspapers and magazines that had relied on selling classified and print ads, and threatened to dethrone television advertising as the primary vehicle for marketers to reach large audiences.

Instead, brands ran their ads on websites, with their promotions often geared to people’s specific interests.

These digital ads fueled the growth of Facebook, Google and Twitter, which offered their search and social networking services for free.

But in return, people were being tracked from site to site by technologies such as “cookies”, and their personal data was used to target them with relevant marketing.

Today, this system, which has grown into a $ 350 billion (S $ 372 billion) digital advertising industry, is being dismantled.

Driven by fears over online privacy, Apple and Google have started revamping the rules for online data collection.

Apple, citing the privacy mantra, has deployed tools that prevent marketers from tracking people.

Google, which relies on digital ads, is trying to have it both ways by reinventing the system so that it can continue to target ads on people without exploiting access to their personal data.

If personal information is no longer the bargaining chip people give for online content and services, something else has to take its place.

Media publishers, app makers, and e-commerce stores are now exploring different avenues to survive a privacy-friendly internet, in some cases overturning their business models.

Many choose to charge people for what they get online by charging subscription fees and other fees instead of using their personal data.

Jeff Green, CEO of Trade Desk, an ad technology company in Ventura, Calif. That works with major ad agencies, said the fight behind the scenes is fundamental to the nature of the web.

“The Internet answers a question it has struggled with for decades, namely: how is the Internet going to pay for itself? ” he said.

The fallout can hurt brands that have relied on targeted advertising to entice people to buy their products. It might hurt tech giants like Facebook at first, but not for long.

Instead, companies that can no longer follow people but still need to advertise are likely to spend more with the biggest tech platforms, which still have the most consumer data.

David Cohen, CEO of the Interactive Advertising Bureau, a business group, said the changes will continue to “drive money and attention to Google, Facebook, Twitter.”


The changes are complicated by opposing views from Google and Apple on how much ad tracking to recall.

Apple wants its customers, who pay extra for their iPhones, to have the right to block tracking entirely.

But Google executives have suggested that Apple has made privacy a privilege for those who can afford its products.

For many people, this means that the internet can start to look different depending on the products they use.

On Apple gadgets, advertisements may only be somewhat relevant to a person’s interests, compared to highly targeted promotions on the Google web.

Website builders can optionally take sides, so some sites that work well in Google’s browser might not even load in Apple’s browser, said Brendan Eich, founder of Brave, the private web browser. .

“It will be the story of two Internets,” he said.

Companies that don’t keep up with the changes risk being crushed.

Increasingly, media publishers and even apps that show the weather are charging subscription fees, much like Netflix is ​​charging monthly fees for video streaming.

Some e-commerce sites are considering raising the prices of the products to maintain their income.

Consider Seven Sisters Scones, a mail order bakery in Johns Creek, Ga. That relies on Facebook ads to promote its items.

Nate Martin, who heads digital marketing for the bakery, said that after Apple blocked ad tracking, its digital marketing campaigns on Facebook became less effective. Since Facebook could no longer get as much data on customers who love baked goods, it was more difficult for the store to find interested shoppers online.

“It all came to a screeching halt,” Martin said. In June, the bakery’s sales fell to US $ 16,000 from US $ 40,000 in May.

Sales have since remained stable, he said.

To offset the declines, Seven Sisters Scones discussed increasing the prices of sample boxes to US $ 36 from US $ 29.

Apple declined to comment, but its executives said advertisers would adapt.

Google said it was working on an approach that would protect people’s data, but also allow advertisers to continue targeting users with ads.


Since the 1990s, much of the web has been rooted in digital advertising. During this decade, a piece of code implanted in web browsers – the “cookie” – began to track users’ browsing activities from site to site.

Marketers used the information to target advertisements to individuals such that a person interested in makeup or bicycles saw advertisements on those topics and products.

After the introduction of the iPhone and Android app stores in 2008, advertisers also collected data on what people were doing in apps by planting invisible trackers.

This information was linked to cookie data and shared with data brokers for even more specific ad targeting.

The result was a vast advertising ecosystem that underpinned free websites and online services.

Sites and apps like BuzzFeed and TikTok have thrived using this model. Even e-commerce sites rely in part on advertising to grow their businesses.

But distrust of these practices began to grow.

In 2018, Facebook became embroiled in the Cambridge Analytica scandal, where people’s Facebook data was inappropriately collected without their consent.

In the same year, European regulators enacted the General Data Protection Regulation, laws designed to protect people’s information.

In 2019, Google and Facebook agreed to pay record fines to the Federal Trade Commission to settle the privacy breach allegations.

In Silicon Valley, Apple has reconsidered its advertising approach. In 2017, Craig Federighi, head of software engineering at Apple, announced that the Safari web browser would prevent cookies from tracking people from site to site.

“It’s kind of like you’re being followed, and it’s because you are,” Federighi said. “Not anymore.”

Apple last year announced the creation of a pop-up in iPhone apps that asks users if they want to be tracked for marketing purposes.

If the user says no, the app should stop monitoring and sharing data with third parties. This sparked an uproar from Facebook, which was one of the affected apps.

In December, the social network ran full-page newspaper ads saying it was “standing up to Apple” on behalf of small businesses that would be hurt once their ads could no longer find specific audiences.

“It’s going to be tough for them to navigate,” Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg said.

Facebook is now developing ways to target people with ads using information collected on their devices, without allowing personal data to be shared with third parties. If the people who click on the deodorant ads also buy sneakers, Facebook can share this template with the advertisers so that they can serve sneaker ads to that group.

It would be less intrusive than sharing personal information like email addresses with advertisers.

“We support giving people more control over how their data is used, but Apple’s far-reaching changes have happened without input from the industry and those most affected,” a Facebook spokesperson said.

Since Apple released the pop-up, more than 80% of iPhone users worldwide have chosen not to follow, according to ad technology companies.

Last month, Peter Farago, an executive at Flurry, a mobile analytics company owned by Verizon Media, posted a post on LinkedIn calling it the “hour of death” for ad tracking on iPhones.

Source link

]]> 0
CURO (CURO) drops 0.29% in active trading on September 17th Sat, 18 Sep 2021 01:39:00 +0000

CURO Group Holdings Corp (NYSE: CURO), a Wichita, Kansas company, fell to close at $ 16.95 on Friday after losing $ 0.05 (0.29%) on volume of 496,320 shares. The stock ranged from a high of $ 17.20 to a low of $ 16.86, while CURO’s market cap now stands at $ 702,232,415.

About CURO Group Holdings Corp

CURO Group Holdings Corp., operating in two countries and powered by its fully integrated technology platform, is a provider of unprivileged consumer credit. In 1997, the company was founded in Riverside, Calif., By three childhood friends from Wichita, Kansas, to meet growing consumer needs for short-term loans. Their success has led to the opening of stores across the United States and an expansion to offer online loans and financial services in two countries. Today, CURO combines its market expertise with a fully integrated technology platform, omnichannel approach and advanced credit decisions to deliver a range of credit products across all media. CURO operates under several brands, including Speedy Cash®, Rapid Cash®, Cash Money®, LendDirect®, Avío Credit®, Opt + ® and Revolve Finance®. With over 20 years of operating experience, CURO offers financial freedom to unprivileged consumers.

Visit the CURO Group Holdings Corp Profile for more information.

About the New York Stock Exchange

The New York Stock Exchange is the world’s largest stock exchange by market value with more than $ 26 trillion. It’s also the leader in initial public offerings, with $ 82 billion raised in 2020, including six of the seven biggest tech deals. 63% of PSPC proceeds in 2020 were raised on the NYSE, including the six biggest deals.

To get more information about CURO Group Holdings Corp and keep up with the latest company updates, you can visit the Company Profile page here: CURO Group Holdings Corp’s Profile. For more information on the financial markets, be sure to visit Equities News. Also, don’t forget to sign up for the Daily Fix to get the best stories delivered to your inbox 5 days a week.

Sources: The chart is provided by TradingView based on 15 minute lag prices. All other data is provided by IEX Cloud as of 8:05 p.m. ET on the day of publication.

The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Readers should not take the author’s statements as formal recommendations and should consult their financial advisor before making any investment decisions. To read our full disclosure, please visit:

President Biden’s new alliance with Australia and Great Britain Angers France and European Union

California Governor Newsom signs affordable housing law

COVID-19 outbreak in Idaho forces health care rationing statewide

JPMorgan launches its first digital overseas bank in UK next week

Federal Reserve Reviews Ethics Policies Following Prolific Transactions Leaked By Two Senior Officials

Chinese real estate developer Evergrande is not ‘too big to fail’ – Global Times

August retail sales rebound 0.7%, surprising economists after July plunge

UN report shows COVID-19 has not slowed the pace of climate change

Source link

]]> 0
To the. Judge Sends Loan Action Against Tribal Co. to Arbitration Sat, 18 Sep 2021 01:12:00 +0000
By Andrew Westney (September 17, 2021, 9:12 p.m. EDT) – An Alabama federal judge has referred to arbitration a woman’s proposed class action claiming that a company owned by the Oglala Sioux tribe charged excessive interest for online loans, claiming that his own victory against the company did not allow him to pursue his broader claims in federal court.

U.S. District Chief Justice Kristi K. DuBose, in an order, on Thursday approved an American Arbitration Association panel ruling that Alabama resident Lillian Easley’s loan contracts with the company WLCC II, which operates as the online lender Arrowhead Advance, were void.

But Judge DuBose rejected Easley’s offer to file claims for a proposed class of Alabama loan clients who …

Stay one step ahead

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You need to know what’s going on with customers, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to stay an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data in articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of prosecution, etc.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, requests, etc.
  • Create personalized alerts for specific case articles and topics and more!


Source link

]]> 0
New Lincoln Project ad attacks Abbott Fri, 17 Sep 2021 19:55:37 +0000

Gregg Abbott was targeted in a Lincoln Project ad for his handling of Covid in Texas, which is currently experiencing around 16,000 new cases a day – and almost as many as in January and February.

The 60-second ad, which was released Friday, accuses the Republican governor of “building a wall” of bodies instead of “the one he promised” – in an apparent nod to the southern state border -United with Mexico, that he and the Republican party have been loud.

Texas has so far seen more than 3.8 million cases of Covid-19, according to analysis by The New York Times, and as The Lincoln Project reminds viewers, more than 60,000 deaths – and more – due to the disease.

Attacking Mr Abbott on the Texas death toll, the ad begins with an ad telling viewers that “Texas is now one of the top states for Covid deaths.” The number of infections and deaths will then flash on the screen, turning red.

“Over 60,000 Texas are buried,” he continues, before comparing the death toll to the size of a “cemetery stretching from Austin to San Antonio” – a distance of about 80 miles (129 km).

The ad ends by saying that the bodies of the Covid dead in Texas would be approximately “3.6 million feet of coffin wood,” which is “enough wood to build an 85-mile-long wall.”

“If Governor Abbott wants to build a new wall,” argues the Lincoln Project, “tell him to stop building this one.”

Texas has reported more than 10,000 Covid infections per day for more than a month, with Governor Abbott himself forced into self-isolation after testing positive for Covid in August – and after receiving both vaccines.

About 70% of Texans have been vaccinated against Covid, according to the health department, and 59% are fully vaccinated – a number 5% more than the US average.

Mr Abbott rejected the mask warrants and went so far as to make it illegal for local governments to issue them – in an apparent rebuttal by advice from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and medical professionals, who argue that masks reduce the spread of Covid.

The independent has contacted Mr Abbott’s office for comment.

]]> 0
Apple and Google remove ‘Navalny’ voting app in Russia Fri, 17 Sep 2021 17:03:24 +0000

MOSCOW – Apple and Google have removed an app to coordinate the protest vote in this weekend’s Russian elections in the country on Friday, a blow to opponents of President Vladimir V. Putin and a demonstration of the limits of Silicon Valley when it comes to resisting the crackdown on dissent around the world.

The decisions came after Russian authorities, who claim the app is illegal, threatened to sue local Apple and Google employees – a sharp escalation in the Kremlin’s campaign to curb the largely unsuccessful internet censored nationwide. A person familiar with Google’s decision said authorities had named specific people who would face prosecution, prompting them to remove the app.

The person declined to be identified for fear of angering the Russian government. Google has over 100 employees nationwide.

Apple did not respond to phone calls, emails, or text messages asking for comment.

The app was created and promoted by allies of opposition leader Alexei A. Navalny, who hoped to use it to consolidate the opposition vote in each of Russia’s 225 constituencies. He disappeared from both tech platforms by the time voting began in the three-day parliamentary elections, in which Mr Putin’s United Russia party – in a carefully managed staged system – holds a huge advantage.